OverviewCompare › qwq:32b vs deepseek-r1:32b
Head-to-head

qwq:32b vs deepseek-r1:32b

Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer.

ModelRunnable simsBlind text avgFailure modes
qwq:32b 8% (7/85)9.10 (20 scored)ERR 4 · STAT 42 · BLANK 16 · DNF 16
deepseek-r1:32b 27% (23/85)8.90 (20 scored)ERR 34 · STAT 7 · BLANK 19 · HANG 1 · DNF 1

Biggest contrasts

Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.

Roundqwq:32bdeepseek-r1:32b
R155 · Linked list with animated pointer relinkingDNFOK
R154 · Ring buffer with producer and consumer at different ratesSTATOK
R140 · Water sloshing in a tilting containerDNFOK
R138 · Two-source wave interference patternBLANKOK
R136 · Double pendulum tracing a chaotic pathDNFOK

→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard

Generated 2026-07-31 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.