Head-to-head
qwq:32b vs Claude Sonnet 5
Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer. Frontier references sit outside the blind field and are deliberately unscored on text.
| Model | Runnable sims | Blind text avg | Failure modes |
|---|---|---|---|
| qwq:32b | 8% (8/95) | 8.70 (30 scored) | ERR 4 · STAT 43 · BLANK 23 · DNF 17 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 frontier reference | 100% (95/95) | unscored by design | — |
Biggest contrasts
Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.
→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard
Generated 2026-08-04 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.