Head-to-head
qwen3-coder:30b vs qwen3:14b
Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer.
| Model | Runnable sims | Blind text avg | Failure modes |
|---|---|---|---|
| qwen3-coder:30b | 25% (21/85) | 9.34 (38 scored) | ERR 36 · STAT 9 · BLANK 18 · HANG 1 |
| qwen3:14b | 28% (24/85) | 8.71 (38 scored) | ERR 39 · STAT 10 · BLANK 12 |
Biggest contrasts
Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.
→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard
Generated 2026-07-31 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.