Overview › Compare › qwen3-coder:30b vs qwen3:14b
Head-to-head

qwen3-coder:30b vs qwen3:14b

Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer.

ModelRunnable simsBlind text avgFailure modes
qwen3-coder:30b 24% (23/95)9.17 (48 scored)ERR 41 · STAT 9 · BLANK 21 · HANG 1
qwen3:14b 31% (29/95)8.73 (48 scored)ERR 42 · STAT 10 · BLANK 13 · HANG 1

Biggest contrasts

Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.

Roundqwen3-coder:30bqwen3:14b
R175 · Noise flowfield painting additive particle trailsBLANKOK
R174 · Recursive fractal tree growing branch by branchBLANKOK
R172 · Raindrops sliding down a window paneERROK
R163 · Prim's algorithm growing a minimum spanning treeERROK
R162 · Breadth-first search flooding a random grid mazeOKERR

→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard

Generated 2026-08-04 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.