OverviewCompare › qwen3-coder:30b vs qwen3:14b
Head-to-head

qwen3-coder:30b vs qwen3:14b

Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer.

ModelRunnable simsBlind text avgFailure modes
qwen3-coder:30b 25% (21/85)9.34 (38 scored)ERR 36 · STAT 9 · BLANK 18 · HANG 1
qwen3:14b 28% (24/85)8.71 (38 scored)ERR 39 · STAT 10 · BLANK 12

Biggest contrasts

Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.

Roundqwen3-coder:30bqwen3:14b
R153 · Binary min-heap with bubble-up and sink-downERROK
R140 · Water sloshing in a tilting containerOKERR
R139 · Small n-body system orbiting a central starOKERR
R125 · Voronoi diagram growing by multi-source flood fillBLANKOK
R124 · Dijkstra's shortest path over weighted terrainBLANKOK

→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard

Generated 2026-07-31 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.