Overview › Compare › qwen3.5:9b vs Claude Sonnet 5
Head-to-head

qwen3.5:9b vs Claude Sonnet 5

Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer. Frontier references sit outside the blind field and are deliberately unscored on text.

ModelRunnable simsBlind text avgFailure modes
qwen3.5:9b 37% (35/95)9.06 (48 scored)ERR 30 · STAT 12 · BLANK 17 · HANG 1
Claude Sonnet 5 frontier reference 100% (95/95)unscored by design—

Biggest contrasts

Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.

Roundqwen3.5:9bClaude Sonnet 5
R175 · Noise flowfield painting additive particle trailsERROK
R173 · Metaball lava lamp with heating and cooling blobsBLANKOK
R172 · Raindrops sliding down a window paneERROK
R171 · Fireworks bursting into fading sparksERROK
R165 · Recursive backtracker carving a maze, then solving itSTATOK

→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard

Generated 2026-08-04 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.