Overview › Compare › gemma4:26b vs qwq:32b
Head-to-head

gemma4:26b vs qwq:32b

Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer.

ModelRunnable simsBlind text avgFailure modes
gemma4:26b 0% (0/2)9.67 (36 scored)ERR 1 · BLANK 1
qwq:32b 8% (8/95)8.70 (30 scored)ERR 4 · STAT 43 · BLANK 23 · DNF 17

Biggest contrasts

Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.

Roundgemma4:26bqwq:32b
R171 · Fireworks bursting into fading sparksERROK
R117 · De Casteljau construction of a Bezier curveBLANKOK
R160 · Critique a generic slogan in 2 sentences + give 2 better alternatives★10★4
R179 · Unify tense and perspective★10★7
R149 · Extract meeting invite into a fixed JSON schema★7★10

→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard

Generated 2026-08-04 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.