Overview › Compare › command-r:35b vs mistral-small:24b
Head-to-head

command-r:35b vs mistral-small:24b

Both models answered the same one-shot tasks under identical rules — no retries, answers published unedited. Two separate axes, never blended: does the code actually run, and how do blind-scored text answers hold up against a written gold answer.

ModelRunnable simsBlind text avgFailure modes
command-r:35b 25% (24/95)6.87 (30 scored)ERR 33 · STAT 10 · BLANK 8 · HANG 3 · DNF 17
mistral-small:24b 32% (30/95)8.26 (38 scored)ERR 29 · STAT 12 · BLANK 9 · HANG 7 · DNF 8

Biggest contrasts

Rounds where the two models diverged most — open them and read both answers side by side.

Roundcommand-r:35bmistral-small:24b
R175 · Noise flowfield painting additive particle trailsOKSTAT
R164 · Boids flocking with separation, alignment, cohesion and a predatorDNFOK
R155 · Linked list with animated pointer relinkingDNFOK
R154 · Ring buffer with producer and consumer at different ratesDNFOK
R152 · Hash table with visible collision chainsOKERR

→ Interactive round-by-round comparison · → Full leaderboard

Generated 2026-08-04 from the published rounds. Harness failures are excluded from every base — a broken cluster node is our fault, not the model's.